kaitian123

Adidas Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as company) air max 90HuaZhu lawsuit adidas (quanzhou) shoes Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as the company), attia HuaZhu king sports (China) Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as company) and king attia individual and industrial and commercial door reach QianMou infringement of registered trademarks and unfair competition in wuhan, hubei, the intermediate people's court in the first 24 court trial. Due to the large YuanBeiGao are submitted to the evidence material, the time of trial lasted nearly 2 days.

According to the first defendant in its business QianMou storefront prominent position using marked "attia king", "adivon" text and graphics and logo, store sales shoes, clothing, and other related product also use the logo. The above products manufacturer for HuaZhu company and attia king company. wholesale nba jerseys According to a lawsuit, adidas HuaZhu company and attia said on its website also king companies use a lot of tort logo, and related business activities. Adidas, wuhan city intermediate people's court decision for the above-mentioned ACTS constitute the three of its registered trademark violations, but the defendant use "attia king" behavior criterion constituting unfair competition, and the compensation for the three judgment of 500,000 yuan economic losses.

In the morning of June 11, mainly by adidas trial site, the three companies were the cross-examination. Adidas mainly presented to the court the adidas ", "" trademark and adidas text" three gang "in article 25 figure trademark commodities such as garments, shoes on the proof that is privileged," the king ", new era cap "attia adivon" relevant public confusion caused by marking the facts, and demonstrates the court evidence of infringement. In the afternoon of march on the main burden. Provide evidence that the defendant, the company enjoys "adivon" text in the first 25 trademark goods, and its exclusive "attia king" enterprise name is related to the Commerce Department approved and registered, its act doesn't constitute infringement. In the process of burden, both sides, cross-examination once was part of the problem, the presiding judge court debate had only just several remind both the evidence given three, without a debate.

On June 12, the court debate, both into the main subject and the facts and the right PanPei quota etc. Notable is, in the trial process, adidas will mark the infringement attia king company called "three gang", nike dunk high and argues that the king company insist attia marked "F the triangle".